Rietveld Code Review Tool
Help | Bug tracker | Discussion group | Source code | Sign in
(645)

Issue 6070043: code review 6070043: runtime: add benchmark for complex128 division (Closed)

Can't Edit
Can't Publish+Mail
Start Review
Created:
12 years ago by chaten
Modified:
12 years ago
Reviewers:
dave
CC:
golang-dev, rsc, minux1
Visibility:
Public.

Description

runtime: add benchmark for complex128 division

Patch Set 1 #

Patch Set 2 : diff -r 6c3ed145bf76 https://code.google.com/p/go/ #

Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+52 lines, -0 lines) Patch
A src/pkg/runtime/complex_test.go View 1 1 chunk +52 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 7
chaten
Hello golang-dev@googlegroups.com (cc: minux.ma@gmail.com), I'd like you to review this change to https://code.google.com/p/go/
12 years ago (2012-04-19 06:02:27 UTC) #1
dave_cheney.net
LGTM. Have you filled in a CLA ? On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 4:02 ...
12 years ago (2012-04-19 06:42:29 UTC) #2
chaten
Yes On 2012/04/19 06:42:29, dfc wrote: > LGTM. Have you filled in a CLA ? ...
12 years ago (2012-04-19 16:05:35 UTC) #3
dave_cheney.net
If there are no objections, I will submit this later today.
12 years ago (2012-04-21 01:21:48 UTC) #4
rsc
LGTM { n += n/d } result = n might work a little better for ...
12 years ago (2012-04-21 02:02:50 UTC) #5
dave_cheney.net
*** Submitted as http://code.google.com/p/go/source/detail?r=53bde4a93e92 *** runtime: add benchmark for complex128 division R=golang-dev, dave, rsc CC=golang-dev, ...
12 years ago (2012-04-21 03:24:56 UTC) #6
dave_cheney.net
12 years ago (2012-04-21 03:27:05 UTC) #7
> might work a little better for avoiding optimizations.
> i bet gccgo compiles the loop away.

Thanks Russ. I made your suggested change. There was no significant change in
the benchmark results using this form.
Sign in to reply to this message.

Powered by Google App Engine
RSS Feeds Recent Issues | This issue
This is Rietveld f62528b