On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 8:10 PM, Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org> wrote: > Lacks RFC ...
14 years, 1 month ago
(2012-02-22 09:50:24 UTC)
#3
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 8:10 PM, Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org> wrote:
> Lacks RFC reference.
Fixed.
> Not sure how I like the look of the contractions. Maybe StatusAmTeapot.
I think regularity wins here. It's a legacy.
Dave.
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 1:50 AM, David Symonds <dsymonds@golang.org> wrote: > On Wed, ...
14 years, 1 month ago
(2012-02-22 09:54:43 UTC)
#4
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 1:50 AM, David Symonds <dsymonds@golang.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 8:10 PM, Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Lacks RFC reference.
>
Fixed.
>
Oh, I meant in the CL description. As a public comment I think it draws
too much attention to itself.
> Not sure how I like the look of the contractions. Maybe StatusAmTeapot.
>
> I think regularity wins here. It's a legacy.
>
Fair enough.
Yellow.
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 8:54 PM, Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org> wrote: > On Wed, ...
14 years, 1 month ago
(2012-02-22 10:11:31 UTC)
#5
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 8:54 PM, Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 1:50 AM, David Symonds <dsymonds@golang.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 8:10 PM, Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Lacks RFC reference.
>>
>>
>> Fixed.
>
>
> Oh, I meant in the CL description. As a public comment I think it draws too
> much attention to itself.
Good point, fixed.
LGTM On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 2:11 AM, David Symonds <dsymonds@golang.org> wrote: > On ...
14 years, 1 month ago
(2012-02-22 10:15:00 UTC)
#6
LGTM
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 2:11 AM, David Symonds <dsymonds@golang.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 8:54 PM, Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 1:50 AM, David Symonds <dsymonds@golang.org>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 8:10 PM, Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Lacks RFC reference.
> >>
> >>
> >> Fixed.
> >
> >
> > Oh, I meant in the CL description. As a public comment I think it draws
> too
> > much attention to itself.
>
> Good point, fixed.
>
http://codereview.appspot.com/5688067/diff/3005/src/pkg/net/http/status.go File src/pkg/net/http/status.go (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/5688067/diff/3005/src/pkg/net/http/status.go#newcode46 src/pkg/net/http/status.go:46: StatusImATeapot = 418 The Im is really hard to ...
14 years, 1 month ago
(2012-02-22 18:40:21 UTC)
#7
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 7:41 AM, Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org> wrote: > It's okay ...
14 years, 1 month ago
(2012-02-22 20:51:55 UTC)
#10
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 7:41 AM, Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org> wrote:
> It's okay that we're setting a new precedent:
> this is a very unusual status message:
> it has an apostrophe.
Yeah, I agree. The new name is also appropriately short and stout.
Issue 5688067: code review 5688067: net/http: add overlooked 418 status code.
(Closed)
Created 14 years, 1 month ago by dsymonds
Modified 14 years, 1 month ago
Reviewers:
Base URL:
Comments: 2