Lets auto numbering of footnotes kick in from commands alone.

Lets auto numbering of footnotes kick in from commands alone.

Gets rid of footnote-auto-numbering in the paper block.
For now, numbers that are not used are skiped.

[MikeSol, 2011-08-01 21:59:06]

From Reinhold's suggestion.

Cheers,
MS

[MikeSol, 2011-08-01 22:04:48]

On 2011/08/01 21:59:06, MikeSol wrote:
> From Reinhold's suggestion.
> 
> Cheers,
> MS

Most recent version passed regtests before the C++ formatting changes.  I've
copied and pasted them, so this should pass as well.  I'll run a full set
tomorrow.

Cheers,
MS

[Reinhold, 2011-08-10 21:31:38]

That's exactly as I envisioned it. Numbering works fine, except in staff
systems. the example that I sent a while ago still has some apparently random
order of the numbering.

http://codereview.appspot.com/4837047/diff/1017/lily/page-layout-problem.cc
File lily/page-layout-problem.cc (right):

http://codereview.appspot.com/4837047/diff/1017/lily/page-layout-problem.cc#n...
lily/page-layout-problem.cc:127: programming_error ("Your numbering function
needs to return a stencil.");
Is there any chance to use the functions of the Input class? They would provide
some code location and tell the user which footnote this message is about

http://codereview.appspot.com/4837047/diff/1017/scm/define-grob-properties.scm
File scm/define-grob-properties.scm (right):

http://codereview.appspot.com/4837047/diff/1017/scm/define-grob-properties.sc...
scm/define-grob-properties.scm:62: numbered?")
Should this really be a public property? I would move it down to the internal
properties.

[pkx166h, 2011-08-28 10:44:54]

passes make and reg tests.

[mikesol_ufl.edu, 2011-08-29 15:13:41]

On Aug 28, 2011, at 12:44 PM, pkx166h@gmail.com wrote:

> passes make and reg tests.
> 
> http://codereview.appspot.com/4837047/


Pushed as 181366ec566a338c265ff4960724202d0d55ef79.

Cheers,
MS