Rietveld Code Review Tool
Help | Bug tracker | Discussion group | Source code | Sign in
(157)

Issue 4572050: [pph] Test cleanup (Closed)

Can't Edit
Can't Publish+Mail
Start Review
Created:
13 years, 10 months ago by Lawrence Crowl
Modified:
12 years, 10 months ago
CC:
gcc-patches_gcc.gnu.org
Base URL:
svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/pph/
Visibility:
Public.

Patch Set 1 #

Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+10 lines, -24 lines) Patch
M gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pph/x1autometh.cc View 1 chunk +1 line, -3 lines 0 comments Download
M gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pph/x1functions.cc View 1 chunk +1 line, -4 lines 0 comments Download
M gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pph/x1special.cc View 1 chunk +0 lines, -4 lines 0 comments Download
M gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pph/x1template.cc View 1 chunk +1 line, -1 line 0 comments Download
M gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pph/x1tmplclass.cc View 1 chunk +2 lines, -3 lines 0 comments Download
M gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pph/x1typerefs.cc View 1 chunk +2 lines, -3 lines 0 comments Download
M gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pph/x1variables.cc View 1 chunk +2 lines, -3 lines 0 comments Download
M gcc/testsuite/lib/dg-pph.exp View 1 chunk +1 line, -3 lines 0 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 4
Lawrence Crowl
Update the test suite to reflect recent fixes and merges from trunk. The following changes ...
13 years, 10 months ago (2011-06-08 20:44:51 UTC) #1
Gabriel Charette
Hey, so I really like the new clean testing system, so that we always quickly ...
13 years, 9 months ago (2011-07-01 22:36:26 UTC) #2
Lawrence Crowl
On 7/1/11, Gabriel Charette <gchare@google.com> wrote: > One problem now though: `// pph asm xdiff`, ...
13 years, 9 months ago (2011-07-02 00:51:44 UTC) #3
Gabriel Charette
13 years, 9 months ago (2011-07-06 21:23:47 UTC) #4
After having a look at how pph.exp works last Friday I think I could
do this myself easily enough.

Or are you still modifying the tests and want me to avoid touching this for now?

Gab

On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 5:51 PM, Lawrence Crowl <crowl@google.com> wrote:
> On 7/1/11, Gabriel Charette <gchare@google.com> wrote:
>> One problem now though: `// pph asm xdiff`, only flags for asm diffs,
>> but those could be different diffs after a change (for the better or
>> worse) and this won't be caught. It's probably hard to get something
>> precise on this, but maybe we could simply add the # of lines of diff
>> expected, e.g. `// pph asm xdiff 32`. Then we XFAIL if the number of
>> expected lines in the diff match, but actually fail if the number of
>> lines in the diff is now different.
>>
>> I'm not very familiar with dg.. Is that doable? Would be very helpful
>> at this stage.
>
> That looks easy enough.  I need to finish the current test stuff
> before I get to that though.
>
> --
> Lawrence Crowl
>
Sign in to reply to this message.

Powered by Google App Engine
RSS Feeds Recent Issues | This issue
This is Rietveld f62528b