Rietveld Code Review Tool
Help | Bug tracker | Discussion group | Source code | Sign in
(1001)

Issue 4572042: [pph] Clean up PPH tests (Closed)

Can't Edit
Can't Publish+Mail
Start Review
Created:
12 years, 11 months ago by Lawrence Crowl
Modified:
11 years, 11 months ago
Reviewers:
Diego Novillo
CC:
gcc-patches_gcc.gnu.org
Base URL:
svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/pph/
Visibility:
Public.

Patch Set 1 #

Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+154 lines, -44 lines) Patch
M gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pph/c120060625-1.h View 2 chunks +5 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download
M gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pph/c120060625-1.cc View 1 chunk +4 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download
M gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pph/c1eabi1.h View 1 chunk +7 lines, -3 lines 0 comments Download
M gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pph/c1eabi1.cc View 1 chunk +6 lines, -3 lines 0 comments Download
M gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pph/c1return-5.h View 1 chunk +2 lines, -2 lines 0 comments Download
M gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pph/c1return-5.cc View 1 chunk +3 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download
M gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pph/c1simple.cc View 1 chunk +4 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download
M gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pph/c1struct.cc View 1 chunk +3 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download
M gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pph/c1variables.cc View 1 chunk +3 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download
M gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pph/c2builtin1.cc View 1 chunk +2 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download
M gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pph/p1mean.cc View 1 chunk +3 lines, -2 lines 0 comments Download
M gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pph/x1autometh.cc View 1 chunk +5 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download
M gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pph/x1functions.cc View 1 chunk +9 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download
M gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pph/x1globalref.cc View 1 chunk +3 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download
M gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pph/x1hardlookup.cc View 1 chunk +4 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download
M gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pph/x1special.cc View 1 chunk +5 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download
M gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pph/x1struct1.cc View 1 chunk +4 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download
M gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pph/x1struct2.cc View 1 chunk +4 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download
M gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pph/x1template.cc View 1 chunk +8 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download
M gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pph/x1tmplclass.cc View 1 chunk +5 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download
M gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pph/x1tmplfunc.cc View 1 chunk +5 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download
M gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pph/x1typerefs.cc View 1 chunk +6 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download
M gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pph/x1variables.cc View 1 chunk +6 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download
M gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pph/x2nontrivinit.cc View 1 chunk +2 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download
M gcc/testsuite/lib/dg-pph.exp View 3 chunks +46 lines, -34 lines 0 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 6
Lawrence Crowl
The purpose of this patch is to make PPH testing clean. Some tests have assembly ...
12 years, 11 months ago (2011-06-05 22:46:33 UTC) #1
Diego Novillo
So, I'm getting this: Running /home/dnovillo/pph/svn/src/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pph/pph.exp ... XPASS: g++.dg/pph/c120060625-1.cc -I. (test for bogus messages, line ...
12 years, 11 months ago (2011-06-06 14:21:21 UTC) #2
Lawrence Crowl
On 6/6/11, Diego Novillo <dnovillo@google.com> wrote: > So, I'm getting this: > > Running /home/dnovillo/pph/svn/src/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pph/pph.exp ...
12 years, 11 months ago (2011-06-06 18:33:40 UTC) #3
Diego Novillo
After getting new failures due to an unrelated fix, I think this will be more ...
12 years, 11 months ago (2011-06-07 18:43:31 UTC) #4
Lawrence Crowl
On 6/7/11, Diego Novillo <dnovillo@google.com> wrote: > After getting new failures due to an unrelated ...
12 years, 11 months ago (2011-06-08 21:09:34 UTC) #5
Lawrence Crowl
12 years, 11 months ago (2011-06-08 21:16:49 UTC) #6
On 6/7/11, Diego Novillo <dnovillo@google.com> wrote:
> After getting new failures due to an unrelated fix, I think this will
> be more trouble than it's worth.
>
> First, we can't get rid of the XPASSes, so those will always be noisy.

Remove all the noise with:

sed -e '
        /-fpph-map=pph.map/     ! {
                /^XPASS: .*test for bogus messages/     d
                /^XPASS: .*test for excess errors/      d
        }

        /^#/            p
        /^ERROR: /      p
        /^XFAIL: /      p
        /^XPASS: /      p
        /^FAIL: /       p

        d
'

>
> Second, some XPASSes will need to be unmarked because we just fixed
> the underlying problem.

That is how we know that what progress we have made.  These should
be reflected in the work list.

>
> Third, we are at such an early stage, that fixes to a test case will
> generally expose failures in other already failing tests, but these
> failures will be in a different place.  So more noise.

That is now we expose remaining tasks.  These should be reflected
in the work list.

>
> I really think that for now the easiest way to keep track of this is
> to have a clean build to compare against.

But the clean build isn't a decent comparison.  The existing tools
only compare against whether or not tests fail.  They fail to
report that a test failed for different reasons.  Given that there
are only twelve tests for which there is a concern, I think we are
better off know where we are.

-- 
Lawrence Crowl
Sign in to reply to this message.

Powered by Google App Engine
RSS Feeds Recent Issues | This issue
This is Rietveld f62528b