Rietveld Code Review Tool
Help | Bug tracker | Discussion group | Source code | Sign in
(2941)

Issue 3396042: Doc: CG: clarify lily-git.tcl and git-cl. (Closed)

Can't Edit
Can't Publish+Mail
Start Review
Created:
13 years, 4 months ago by Graham Percival (old account)
Modified:
13 years, 3 months ago
Reviewers:
Valentin Villenave, carl.d.sorensen
CC:
lilypond-devel_gnu.org
Visibility:
Public.

Description

Doc: CG: clarify lily-git.tcl and git-cl.

Patch Set 1 #

Total comments: 4

Patch Set 2 : CG: use out-of-tree building in main compiling chapter. #

Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+42 lines, -38 lines) Patch
M Documentation/included/compile.itexi View 1 7 chunks +42 lines, -38 lines 0 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 4
Graham Percival (old account)
Please review.
13 years, 4 months ago (2010-12-06 17:20:19 UTC) #1
Carl
LGTM. Carl
13 years, 4 months ago (2010-12-06 17:49:25 UTC) #2
Valentin Villenave
Hi Graham, LGTM as well. Just a few comments: http://codereview.appspot.com/3396042/diff/1/Documentation/contributor/source-code.itexi File Documentation/contributor/source-code.itexi (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/3396042/diff/1/Documentation/contributor/source-code.itexi#newcode143 Documentation/contributor/source-code.itexi:143: ...
13 years, 4 months ago (2010-12-06 23:12:09 UTC) #3
Graham Percival (old account)
13 years, 4 months ago (2010-12-07 17:27:17 UTC) #4
On 2010/12/06 23:12:09, Valentin Villenave wrote:
> Hi Graham,
> LGTM as well. Just a few comments:

Thanks, pushed.

> Documentation/contributor/source-code.itexi:143: @quotation
> Is there a rule for the use of @quotation? (I noticed there's another one in
> source-code.itexi.) If so, we probably should add it to the CG's Syntax
Survey.

No, but I don't think we need to mention it.  The CG is a special case; the
usual docs shouldn't use quotation.
 
> I wouldn't bother with the size limit, it's much less drastic on frogs@. What
I
> *would* mention, however, is to add [PATCH] in the email's subject.

Thanks, done.
 
> Documentation/contributor/source-code.itexi:1032: You must have a gmail
account.
> Are all Google accounts Gmail accounts? (I don't suppose it's owrth adding a
> @uref{https://www.google.com/accounts/NewAccount} link, is it?)

I don't know; I just left that part of the docs alone.  Once the current
discussion about virtualization dies down, I'll ask somebody to look into gmail
vs. google accounts.
 
>
http://codereview.appspot.com/3396042/diff/1/Documentation/contributor/source...
> Documentation/contributor/source-code.itexi:1051: answer with a newline (CR).
> How about "just hit Return"?

I think that "newline (CR)" is a bit more technical, so I left it as-is.  I'm
not particularly fussy about this, though.
Sign in to reply to this message.

Powered by Google App Engine
RSS Feeds Recent Issues | This issue
This is Rietveld f62528b