Rietveld Code Review Tool
Help | Bug tracker | Discussion group | Source code | Sign in
(3291)

Issue 2478042: issue 9807 part 1

Can't Edit
Can't Publish+Mail
Start Review
Created:
13 years, 6 months ago by barry
Modified:
13 years, 6 months ago
Reviewers:
Antoine Pitrou
Base URL:
http://svn.python.org/view/*checkout*/python/branches/py3k/
Visibility:
Public.

Patch Set 1 #

Patch Set 2 : fixed python-config.in #

Total comments: 6

Patch Set 3 : resolve __ap__'s comments #

Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+96 lines, -45 lines) Patch
M Doc/library/sys.rst View 1 2 1 chunk +5 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download
M Lib/test/test_sys.py View 1 2 1 chunk +2 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download
M Makefile.pre.in View 1 2 4 chunks +8 lines, -1 line 0 comments Download
M Misc/python-config.in View 1 2 2 chunks +4 lines, -1 line 0 comments Download
M Python/sysmodule.c View 1 2 1 chunk +4 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download
M configure View 1 2 12 chunks +39 lines, -21 lines 0 comments Download
M configure.in View 1 2 9 chunks +32 lines, -20 lines 0 comments Download
M pyconfig.h.in View 1 2 2 chunks +2 lines, -2 lines 0 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 2
Antoine Pitrou
http://codereview.appspot.com/2478042/diff/2001/configure.in File configure.in (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/2478042/diff/2001/configure.in#newcode3646 configure.in:3646: # shared library name on some platforms. Why only ...
13 years, 6 months ago (2010-10-14 23:00:57 UTC) #1
barry
13 years, 6 months ago (2010-10-15 16:25:42 UTC) #2
http://codereview.appspot.com/2478042/diff/2001/configure.in
File configure.in (right):

http://codereview.appspot.com/2478042/diff/2001/configure.in#newcode3646
configure.in:3646: # shared library name on some platforms.
On 2010/10/14 23:00:57, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> Why only some platforms? Where does the list come from?

From earlier sections, IIRC.  I don't think we have an official list of shared
library supported platforms, so we'll just have to modify this list as platform
champions come forward.

http://codereview.appspot.com/2478042/diff/2001/configure.in#newcode3649
configure.in:3649: SunOS*)
On 2010/10/14 23:00:57, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> Why a separate case for SunOS? I don't see any difference.

I grabbed this from an earlier section with enabled_shared, but you're right,
after modification, there's no difference so I'll roll this into one clause.

http://codereview.appspot.com/2478042/diff/2001/configure.in#newcode3653
configure.in:3653: INSTSONAME="$LDLIBRARY".$SOVERSION.${ABIFLAGS}
On 2010/10/14 23:00:57, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> Please put the ABIFLAGS before the ".so.3.2".

Right, we did agree to that.  It's not a simple change though because $LDLIBRARY
needs to use a different variable than $VERSION.  It's actually a PITA ;) and
will necessitate changes on OSes I don't have access to, so informing python-dev
will be required.  I'll see what I can do though.
Sign in to reply to this message.

Powered by Google App Engine
RSS Feeds Recent Issues | This issue
This is Rietveld f62528b