Code review - Issue 9015043: jujuc: fix lp:1172895https://codereview.appspot.com/2013-05-02T16:02:04+00:00rietveld
Message from unknown
2013-04-29T15:36:45+00:00fwereadeurn:md5:fccad016a466b30ce0ec4445512a2c1f
Message from fwereade@gmail.com
2013-04-29T15:36:50+00:00fwereadeurn:md5:584ec7b5a878c634b1ae2b77debe4cd8
Please take a look.
Message from fwereade@gmail.com
2013-04-29T16:37:13+00:00fwereadeurn:md5:a7d7db63cd2f67685e7d2bf9aa64506e
https://codereview.appspot.com/9015043/diff/1/worker/uniter/jujuc/relation-get.go
File worker/uniter/jujuc/relation-get.go (left):
https://codereview.appspot.com/9015043/diff/1/worker/uniter/jujuc/relation-get.go#oldcode42
worker/uniter/jujuc/relation-get.go:42: // TODO FWER implement --format shell lp:1033511
note: we WONTFIXed this
Message from dimiter.naydenov@canonical.com
2013-04-29T16:56:09+00:00dimiternurn:md5:96296ddcbe369ff0a27f6c20fde7b8ed
LGTM
Message from rogpeppe@gmail.com
2013-04-30T14:35:44+00:00rogurn:md5:93d7058cb180b93568216eef79977310
LGTM assuming this is the python behaviour
Message from unknown
2013-05-02T16:01:05+00:00fwereadeurn:md5:777957ac040f6fe2673d878eda422890
Message from fwereade@gmail.com
2013-05-02T16:02:04+00:00fwereadeurn:md5:06028b082000a34d8afb718101462d8c
*** Submitted:
jujuc: fix lp:1172895
I have no idea how we ended up changing the implementation here.
R=
CC=
https://codereview.appspot.com/9015043