code review 8250043: doc/go1.1.html: additional tweaks

doc/go1.1.html: additional tweaks

[dave_cheney.net, 2013-04-02 06:11:06]

Hello r@golang.org, adg@golang.org (cc: golang-dev@googlegroups.com),

I'd like you to review this change to
https://code.google.com/p/go

[adg, 2013-04-02 11:37:18]

LGTM

[r, 2013-04-02 13:52:18]

https://codereview.appspot.com/8250043/diff/5001/doc/go1.1.html
File doc/go1.1.html (right):

https://codereview.appspot.com/8250043/diff/5001/doc/go1.1.html#newcode360
doc/go1.1.html:360: <code>openbsd/386</code> and <code>openbsd/amd64</code>
platforms. An ARMv6
newline after sentence.

https://codereview.appspot.com/8250043/diff/5001/doc/go1.1.html#newcode361
doc/go1.1.html:361: or better processor is required for <code>freebsd/arm</code>
or
"better"? do you mean "later"?

https://codereview.appspot.com/8250043/diff/5001/doc/go1.1.html#newcode362
doc/go1.1.html:362: <code>netbsd/arm</code> platforms.
i think you can drop 'platforms' here - it's clear.

[minux1, 2013-04-02 13:58:54]

https://codereview.appspot.com/8250043/diff/5001/doc/go1.1.html
File doc/go1.1.html (right):

https://codereview.appspot.com/8250043/diff/5001/doc/go1.1.html#newcode361
doc/go1.1.html:361: or better processor is required for <code>freebsd/arm</code>
or
On 2013/04/02 13:52:19, r wrote:
> "better"? do you mean "later"?
i think "ARMv6 or better" is ok here.

we could also say this to be more specific:
ARMv6 (ARM11) or ARMv7 (Cortex-A series).

[r, 2013-04-02 15:21:56]

I think an amd64 is better than an arm, but that's not what you're
trying to say, so let's be clear. Your rewrite is fine.

-rob

[dave_cheney.net, 2013-04-03 01:48:54]

Thank you for your comments. I'm sorry such a simple documentation exercise has
consumed so much of everyone's time.

https://codereview.appspot.com/8250043/diff/5001/doc/go1.1.html
File doc/go1.1.html (right):

https://codereview.appspot.com/8250043/diff/5001/doc/go1.1.html#newcode360
doc/go1.1.html:360: <code>openbsd/386</code> and <code>openbsd/amd64</code>
platforms. An ARMv6
On 2013/04/02 13:52:19, r wrote:
> newline after sentence.

Done.

https://codereview.appspot.com/8250043/diff/5001/doc/go1.1.html#newcode361
doc/go1.1.html:361: or better processor is required for <code>freebsd/arm</code>
or
On 2013/04/02 13:58:54, minux wrote:
> On 2013/04/02 13:52:19, r wrote:
> > "better"? do you mean "later"?
> i think "ARMv6 or better" is ok here.

I went with "later", ARMv7 cores were designed after ARMv6, and it sidesteps any
pedantic discussions of which is better.
 
> we could also say this to be more specific:
> ARMv6 (ARM11) or ARMv7 (Cortex-A series).

This is the kind of detail I was hoping to exclude.

https://codereview.appspot.com/8250043/diff/5001/doc/go1.1.html#newcode362
doc/go1.1.html:362: <code>netbsd/arm</code> platforms.
On 2013/04/02 13:52:19, r wrote:
> i think you can drop 'platforms' here - it's clear.

Done.

[dave_cheney.net, 2013-04-03 01:49:20]

Hello r@golang.org, adg@golang.org, minux.ma@gmail.com (cc:
golang-dev@googlegroups.com),

Please take another look.

[r, 2013-04-03 04:44:38]

LGTM

[dave_cheney.net, 2013-04-03 05:55:03]

*** Submitted as https://code.google.com/p/go/source/detail?r=cfe93dfc5788 ***

doc/go1.1.html: additional tweaks

R=r, adg, minux.ma
CC=golang-dev
https://codereview.appspot.com/8250043