Rietveld Code Review Tool
Help | Bug tracker | Discussion group | Source code | Sign in
(1311)

Unified Diff: LayoutTests/imported/w3c/web-platform-tests/intersection-observer/zero-area-element-hidden-expected.txt

Issue 347940043: Logic for same-document implicit root intersection
Patch Set: Created 5 years, 7 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Please Sign in to add in-line comments.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: LayoutTests/imported/w3c/web-platform-tests/intersection-observer/zero-area-element-hidden-expected.txt
diff --git a/LayoutTests/imported/w3c/web-platform-tests/intersection-observer/zero-area-element-hidden-expected.txt b/LayoutTests/imported/w3c/web-platform-tests/intersection-observer/zero-area-element-hidden-expected.txt
index 28aa4902b1099488e9bca089552c3bcb7976b22e..29fd5f25a5b18570d857f14bf1b674a92e259702 100644
--- a/LayoutTests/imported/w3c/web-platform-tests/intersection-observer/zero-area-element-hidden-expected.txt
+++ b/LayoutTests/imported/w3c/web-platform-tests/intersection-observer/zero-area-element-hidden-expected.txt
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
PASS A zero-area hidden target should not be intersecting.
-FAIL First rAF. assert_equals: entries[0].boundingClientRect.left expected 8 but got 0
+PASS First rAF.

Powered by Google App Engine
RSS Feeds Recent Issues | This issue
This is Rietveld f62528b