Web: Add GSoC entry for ScholarLY

Web: Add GSoC entry for ScholarLY

It has been discussed on lilypond-devel
(https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2016-01/msg00139.html)
that the ScholarLY library might be an appropriate suggestion for a GSoC
project.

This is intended to start the reviewing of the GSoC page.

[pwm, 2016-01-27 19:44:38]

LGTM with an edit and a broader question about the mentor listings. -Paul

https://codereview.appspot.com/282290043/diff/1/Documentation/web/community.i...
File Documentation/web/community.itexi (right):

https://codereview.appspot.com/282290043/diff/1/Documentation/web/community.i...
Documentation/web/community.itexi:936: @strong{Mentor(s):} Urs Liska
Just use "Mentor:" if there's only one listed.  (See issue 4750 which drops the
use of "(s)".) 

Maybe use "Potential Mentor:" for consistency with the other listings?

Do we want to make a distinction between "Mentor" and "Potential Mentor" here? 
Using "Potential Mentor" for all listings means less to update from one year to
the next.  Then, if and when a student expresses interest, at that point we
would confirm whether the potential mentors listed are willing and available to
be mentors.

[git, 2016-01-27 19:53:45]

https://codereview.appspot.com/282290043/diff/1/Documentation/web/community.i...
File Documentation/web/community.itexi (right):

https://codereview.appspot.com/282290043/diff/1/Documentation/web/community.i...
Documentation/web/community.itexi:936: @strong{Mentor(s):} Urs Liska
On 2016/01/27 19:44:38, pwm wrote:
> Just use "Mentor:" if there's only one listed.  (See issue 4750 which drops
the
> use of "(s)".) 

OK, didn't realize this. I was consistent with *current* convention.
Done

> 
> Maybe use "Potential Mentor:" for consistency with the other listings?
> 
> Do we want to make a distinction between "Mentor" and "Potential Mentor" here?

> Using "Potential Mentor" for all listings means less to update from one year
to
> the next.  Then, if and when a student expresses interest, at that point we
> would confirm whether the potential mentors listed are willing and available
to
> be mentors.

Again, I didn't realize that change in your pending request.
I've updated this.

But if there's no other reason I won't upload a new patchset for this.

We'll have to reconsider much of that page anyway due to the feedback from those
listed as potential mentors.

[git, 2016-01-28 08:18:48]

https://codereview.appspot.com/282290043/diff/1/Documentation/web/community.i...
File Documentation/web/community.itexi (right):

https://codereview.appspot.com/282290043/diff/1/Documentation/web/community.i...
Documentation/web/community.itexi:917: ScholarLY is a library in
@uref{https://github.com/openlilylib/snippets, openLilyLib} that provides
functionality
I've also added this missing line break (no need for new patch set, I think).