Rietveld Code Review Tool
Help | Bug tracker | Discussion group | Source code | Sign in
(2367)

Issue 194770043: compare LilyPond Rationals without unnecessary overflow; issue 4180

Can't Edit
Can't Publish+Mail
Start Review
Created:
9 years, 4 months ago by Keith
Modified:
9 years, 3 months ago
CC:
lilypond-devel_gnu.org
Visibility:
Public.

Description

optimized, but vulnerable (before patch) percussion part real 0m28.881s user 0m27.170s sys 0m0.707s piano real 0m21.976s user 0m21.120s sys 0m0.311s straightforward (after patch) percussion part real 0m28.807s user 0m27.199s sys 0m0.732s piano real 0m22.057s user 0m21.199s sys 0m0.322s

Patch Set 1 #

Total comments: 1

Patch Set 2 : inf and zero tests are fine #

Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+3 lines, -3 lines) Patch
M flower/rational.cc View 1 chunk +3 lines, -3 lines 0 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 3
Keith
https://codereview.appspot.com/194770043/diff/1/flower/rational.cc File flower/rational.cc (left): https://codereview.appspot.com/194770043/diff/1/flower/rational.cc#oldcode222 flower/rational.cc:222: return 0; Here we have already determined that r ...
9 years, 4 months ago (2014-12-28 08:13:59 UTC) #1
Trevor Daniels
LGTM Trevor
9 years, 3 months ago (2014-12-28 22:10:10 UTC) #2
Dan Eble
9 years, 3 months ago (2014-12-30 01:49:11 UTC) #3
LGTM
Sign in to reply to this message.

Powered by Google App Engine
RSS Feeds Recent Issues | This issue
This is Rietveld f62528b