documents extending existing model fields

[udono, 2009-07-07 20:08:35]

Hey Ian, 
thanks for documentation. I put some remarks about formating.
Regards 
Udo Spallek

http://codereview.appspot.com/88123/diff/1/2
File doc/models.rst (right):

http://codereview.appspot.com/88123/diff/1/2#newcode153
Line 153: +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
The len of the underline characters needed to be the same as the text to be
underlined to avoid sphinx warnings.

http://codereview.appspot.com/88123/diff/1/2#newcode193
Line 193: Extending existing fields from an existing model
The len of the underline characters needed to be the same as the text to be
underlined to avoid sphinx warnings.

[Ian Wilson, 2009-07-07 20:47:14]

Okay fixed it, will try to remember that in the future.

On 2009/07/07 20:08:35, udo.spallek wrote:
> Hey Ian, 
> thanks for documentation. I put some remarks about formating.
> Regards 
> Udo Spallek
> 
> http://codereview.appspot.com/88123/diff/1/2
> File doc/models.rst (right):
> 
> http://codereview.appspot.com/88123/diff/1/2#newcode153
> Line 153: +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> The len of the underline characters needed to be the same as the text to be
> underlined to avoid sphinx warnings.
> 
> http://codereview.appspot.com/88123/diff/1/2#newcode193
> Line 193: Extending existing fields from an existing model
> The len of the underline characters needed to be the same as the text to be
> underlined to avoid sphinx warnings.

[udono, 2009-10-27 11:55:48]

can be closed