Rietveld Code Review Tool
Help | Bug tracker | Discussion group | Source code | Sign in
(753)

Issue 6868091: Issue 2981: Let \set ... = *undefined* unset values rather than overwriting. (Closed)

Can't Edit
Can't Publish+Mail
Start Review
Created:
11 years, 3 months ago by dak
Modified:
11 years, 3 months ago
Reviewers:
CC:
lilypond-devel_gnu.org
Visibility:
Public.

Description

Issue 2981: Let \set ... = *undefined* unset values rather than overwriting. Also makes \once\set deal properly with a value that is not previously defined in the current context.

Patch Set 1 #

Patch Set 2 : change value for unsetting to *undefined* instead of '() #

Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+17 lines, -4 lines) Patch
M lily/context.cc View 1 1 chunk +6 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download
M lily/lily-guile.cc View 1 1 chunk +1 line, -1 line 0 comments Download
M lily/property-iterator.cc View 1 1 chunk +10 lines, -3 lines 0 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 1
dak
11 years, 3 months ago (2012-12-09 13:47:22 UTC) #1
change value for unsetting to *undefined* instead of '()
Sign in to reply to this message.

Powered by Google App Engine
RSS Feeds Recent Issues | This issue
This is Rietveld f62528b