You have taken the path of removing THANKS altogether if I understand correctly. I am ...
11 years, 8 months ago
(2012-08-13 09:32:10 UTC)
#2
You have taken the path of removing THANKS altogether if I understand correctly.
I am not sure whether we should not replace it by the edited output of
git shortlog -s release/2.14.2-1..release/2.15.95-1
instead, manually. That would cause the least disruption to the code.
At any rate, regarding your approach: Documentation/included/authors.itexi still
refers to THANKS. Somewhat surprisingly, so does
Documentation/hu/web/basic-authors.itexi.
Also check python/auxiliar/postprocess_html.py.
On 2012/08/13 09:32:10, dak wrote: > You have taken the path of removing THANKS altogether ...
11 years, 8 months ago
(2012-08-13 21:21:11 UTC)
#3
On 2012/08/13 09:32:10, dak wrote:
> You have taken the path of removing THANKS altogether if I understand
correctly.
Yes, as I was away from development during late 2.13 and almost all of 2.15
series, I'm not the best person to update THANKS in case we decided to (I could
only do "git shortlog -s" and grep for "thank" in "git log"), and nobody in
position to do it took the effort to update it, so IMHO this is the route to
take. Otherwise, if we we decide to keep THANKS, then I'll tag the issue
Needs-policy and let's update THANKS at the meeting in Waltrop if nobody has
done it before.
> I am not sure whether we should not replace it by the edited output of
> git shortlog -s release/2.14.2-1..release/2.15.95-1
> instead, manually. That would cause the least disruption to the code.
Doing so would boil down to updating THANKS as it used to be done, minus a few
entries in Suggestions (see my feeling about keeping THANKS above in this
message). I think that in this situation "disruption to the code" or the build
system is a wrong motivation to use.
> At any rate, regarding your approach: Documentation/included/authors.itexi
still
> refers to THANKS. Somewhat surprisingly, so does
> Documentation/hu/web/basic-authors.itexi.
>
> Also check python/auxiliar/postprocess_html.py.
Oh right, the new patch should address this.
Issue 6454140: Fix Issue 2366 "THANKS needs updating or deleting"
(Closed)
Created 11 years, 8 months ago by John Mandereau
Modified 11 years, 8 months ago
Reviewers: Graham Percival, dak
Base URL: http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=lilypond.git/trunk/
Comments: 0