Rietveld Code Review Tool
Help | Bug tracker | Discussion group | Source code | Sign in
(4310)

Issue 6425045: CG: clarify staging branch policy (Closed)

Can't Edit
Can't Publish+Mail
Start Review
Created:
11 years, 9 months ago by John Mandereau
Modified:
11 years, 8 months ago
Reviewers:
janek, dak
CC:
lilypond-devel_gnu.org
Base URL:
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=lilypond.git/trunk/
Visibility:
Public.

Description

CG: clarify staging branch policy The big paragraph is suggested by David Kastrup in http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2012-07/msg00472.html

Patch Set 1 #

Total comments: 2
Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+12 lines, -0 lines) Patch
M Documentation/contributor/administration.itexi View 1 chunk +3 lines, -0 lines 2 comments Download
M Documentation/contributor/source-code.itexi View 1 chunk +9 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 3
janek
LGTM
11 years, 9 months ago (2012-07-18 15:31:03 UTC) #1
dak
Other than that, LGTM. http://codereview.appspot.com/6425045/diff/1/Documentation/contributor/administration.itexi File Documentation/contributor/administration.itexi (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/6425045/diff/1/Documentation/contributor/administration.itexi#newcode280 Documentation/contributor/administration.itexi:280: @warning{in case the build fails, ...
11 years, 9 months ago (2012-07-18 15:39:36 UTC) #2
John Mandereau
11 years, 9 months ago (2012-07-18 22:31:45 UTC) #3
Pushed to staging after moving the @warning as suggested.

http://codereview.appspot.com/6425045/diff/1/Documentation/contributor/admini...
File Documentation/contributor/administration.itexi (right):

http://codereview.appspot.com/6425045/diff/1/Documentation/contributor/admini...
Documentation/contributor/administration.itexi:280: @warning{in case the build
fails, do not try to push fixes on top of
On 2012/07/18 15:39:36, dak wrote:
> The placement of this warning in the middle of the cron instructions seems a
bit
> weird.  It seems like it belongs either at the end of the section, or
somewhere
> close to where the motivation of staging-patchy is explained.

You're right, I moved it after line 255
"them in a logfile. It also merges @code{staging} into @code{master}."
Sign in to reply to this message.

Powered by Google App Engine
RSS Feeds Recent Issues | This issue
This is Rietveld f62528b