Also makes GrGLProgram responsible for deleting its own gl resources.
LGTM. Any particular reason to move it to a factory?
It seemed cleaner for the callers (try creating and check return) and I want to add a member that has to be initialized from the GrGLContextInfo at GrGLProgram construction time. On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 9:52 AM, <tomhudson@google.com> wrote: > LGTM. > > Any particular reason to move it to a factory? > > http://codereview.appspot.com/**6407049/<http://codereview.appspot.com/6407049/> >
Closed with r4646.