Add support for additionalProperties when printing schema'd objects.

[aiuto, 2012-07-12 19:21:32]

lgtm - modulo the discussion about having props and additionalProps, which is
admittedly strange.

http://codereview.appspot.com/6348104/diff/1/apiclient/schema.py
File apiclient/schema.py (right):

http://codereview.appspot.com/6348104/diff/1/apiclient/schema.py#newcode251
apiclient/schema.py:251: elif 'additionalProperties' in schema:
It's possible, but very rare, for a schema to have both properties AND
additionalProperties. The old buzz stuff did that. The way I proposed supporting
that for Java was to generate the class with the properties, but change the
superclass from GenericJson to  Map<string, type defined by
additionalProperties>. 

For Python it probably matters less, but perhaps it does for documentation.

[jcgregorio_google, 2012-07-12 20:05:34]

Committed at
http://code.google.com/p/google-api-python-client/source/detail?r=c008a2e3c1c...

On 2012/07/12 19:21:32, aiuto wrote:
> lgtm - modulo the discussion about having props and additionalProps, which is
> admittedly strange.
> 
> http://codereview.appspot.com/6348104/diff/1/apiclient/schema.py
> File apiclient/schema.py (right):
> 
> http://codereview.appspot.com/6348104/diff/1/apiclient/schema.py#newcode251
> apiclient/schema.py:251: elif 'additionalProperties' in schema:
> It's possible, but very rare, for a schema to have both properties AND
> additionalProperties. The old buzz stuff did that. The way I proposed
supporting
> that for Java was to generate the class with the properties, but change the
> superclass from GenericJson to  Map<string, type defined by
> additionalProperties>. 
> 
> For Python it probably matters less, but perhaps it does for documentation.