http://codereview.appspot.com/63214/diff/1/4 File features/src/main/javascript/features/core.io/io.js (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/63214/diff/1/4#newcode367 Line 367: if (window.oauthReceivedCallbackUrl_) { Why is this being placed ...
16 years, 3 months ago
(2009-06-12 23:24:19 UTC)
#1
http://codereview.appspot.com/63214/diff/1/4 File features/src/main/javascript/features/core.io/io.js (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/63214/diff/1/4#newcode367 Line 367: if (window.oauthReceivedCallbackUrl_) { Because I'm trying to make ...
16 years, 3 months ago
(2009-06-12 23:54:52 UTC)
#2
http://codereview.appspot.com/63214/diff/1/4
File features/src/main/javascript/features/core.io/io.js (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/63214/diff/1/4#newcode367
Line 367: if (window.oauthReceivedCallbackUrl_) {
Because I'm trying to make this work automatically even for gadgets that don't
use the popup library. If we can do that, we don't need to ask gadget authors
to change their gadgets to support 1.0a.
I'm not particular about window vs gadgets vs gadgets.io, the main thing is that
OAuth gadgets today don't actually require gadgets.oauth.Popup in order to work.
The main reason to prefer window over gadgets.io is that osapi.oauth might make
gadgets.io obsolete.
Issue 63214: don't depend on gadgets.oauth.Popup for basic OAuth support
Created 16 years, 3 months ago by beaton
Modified 16 years, 3 months ago
Reviewers: etnu00, shindig.remailer_gmail.com
Base URL: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/shindig/trunk/
Comments: 3