Add documentation for dodecaphonic-no-repeat

Add documentation for dodecaphonic-no-repeat


Add dodecaphonic-no-repeat accidentalStyle

This adds an accidental style that works like the dodecaphonic style
except that it does _not_ print an accidental if the note is
in the same voice immediately preceded with a note of the same pitch.

The contribution is by David Nalesnik.

[uliska, 2014-02-10 12:44:28]

This is an addition that David Nalesnik provided upon my request. I consider
this a commonly used accidental style in contemporary music.

[pkx166h, 2014-02-10 12:50:27]

Thanks Urs.

Some minor points.

https://codereview.appspot.com/61510043/diff/1/Documentation/notation/pitches...
File Documentation/notation/pitches.itely (right):

https://codereview.appspot.com/61510043/diff/1/Documentation/notation/pitches...
Documentation/notation/pitches.itely:2453: This rule reflects a practice used by
numerous contemporary
This rule...

Above we have used the term 'style' as opposed to rule I think. I have no
preference, but make sure we are consistent in this section, that's all.

...reflects a practice used by numerous contemporary...

irrelevant (interesting but just 'fluff'), perhaps just remove the first
sentence entirely and start the next sentence (NB the '--' you use is never
repeated after the digression in the sentence, so it makes the 'While..' if the
sentence look strange. So just start the sentence with 'Like the dodecaphonic
accidental...' and be done.

[uliska, 2014-02-10 13:17:56]

Reword documentation according to suggestions.

[uliska, 2014-02-10 13:18:22]

On 2014/02/10 12:50:27, J_lowe wrote:
> Thanks Urs.
> 
> Some minor points.
> 
>
https://codereview.appspot.com/61510043/diff/1/Documentation/notation/pitches...
> File Documentation/notation/pitches.itely (right):
> 
>
https://codereview.appspot.com/61510043/diff/1/Documentation/notation/pitches...
> Documentation/notation/pitches.itely:2453: This rule reflects a practice used
by
> numerous contemporary
> This rule...
> 
> Above we have used the term 'style' as opposed to rule I think. I have no
> preference, but make sure we are consistent in this section, that's all.

I see your point, but actually each accidental style's description starts with
"This rule".
I think this refers to the defined rule that is responsible for creating the
display style.

So I wouldn't change this.

> 
> ...reflects a practice used by numerous contemporary...
> 
> irrelevant (interesting but just 'fluff'), perhaps just remove the first
> sentence entirely and start the next sentence (NB the '--' you use is never
> repeated after the digression in the sentence, so it makes the 'While..' if
the
> sentence look strange. So just start the sentence with 'Like the dodecaphonic
> accidental...' and be done.

Done