Rietveld Code Review Tool
Help | Bug tracker | Discussion group | Source code | Sign in
(5165)

Issue 5649054: Checks to see that stencil commands have the correct number of arguments.

Can't Edit
Can't Publish+Mail
Start Review
Created:
12 years, 2 months ago by MikeSol
Modified:
12 years, 2 months ago
Reviewers:
dak
CC:
lilypond-devel_gnu.org
Visibility:
Public.

Description

Checks to see that stencil commands have the correct number of arguments.

Patch Set 1 #

Total comments: 1
Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+100 lines, -53 lines) Patch
M lily/include/lily-guile.hh View 2 chunks +2 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download
M lily/include/stencil.hh View 1 chunk +1 line, -0 lines 0 comments Download
M lily/lily-guile.cc View 2 chunks +18 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download
M lily/stencil-expression.cc View 2 chunks +23 lines, -4 lines 1 comment Download
M lily/stencil-scheme.cc View 2 chunks +5 lines, -3 lines 0 comments Download
M scm/backend-library.scm View 1 chunk +9 lines, -8 lines 0 comments Download
M scm/define-stencil-commands.scm View 2 chunks +42 lines, -38 lines 0 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 1
dak
12 years, 2 months ago (2012-02-12 15:21:44 UTC) #1
http://codereview.appspot.com/5649054/diff/1/lily/stencil-expression.cc
File lily/stencil-expression.cc (right):

http://codereview.appspot.com/5649054/diff/1/lily/stencil-expression.cc#newco...
lily/stencil-expression.cc:31: nargs = scm_permanent_object (scm_cons (scm_cons
(ly_symbol2scm ("dummy"), SCM_EOL), SCM_EOL));
dummy?

The whole stuff is totally incomprehensible.  It is not clear what is stored
where and for what reason, and there is no documentation whatsoever.  It was bad
before, agreed, but it has become much worse.
Sign in to reply to this message.

Powered by Google App Engine
RSS Feeds Recent Issues | This issue
This is Rietveld f62528b