Rietveld Code Review Tool
Help | Bug tracker | Discussion group | Source code | Sign in
(321)

Issue 5623051: Fix tuplet subdivision (issue 2243) (Closed)

Can't Edit
Can't Publish+Mail
Start Review
Created:
12 years, 3 months ago by Carl
Modified:
12 years, 2 months ago
Reviewers:
MikeSol
CC:
lilypond-devel_gnu.org
Visibility:
Public.

Description

Fix tuplet subdivision (issue 2243)

Patch Set 1 #

Total comments: 1

Patch Set 2 : Fix documentation bug, subdivide only at tuplet + beat #

Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+76 lines, -15 lines) Patch
A input/regression/tuplet-subdivision.ly View 1 chunk +17 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download
M lily/auto-beam-engraver.cc View 1 chunk +2 lines, -1 line 0 comments Download
M lily/beam-engraver.cc View 1 chunk +2 lines, -1 line 0 comments Download
M lily/beaming-pattern.cc View 1 6 chunks +22 lines, -8 lines 0 comments Download
M lily/include/beaming-pattern.hh View 2 chunks +5 lines, -2 lines 0 comments Download
M lily/stem.cc View 1 1 chunk +1 line, -0 lines 0 comments Download
M lily/stem-engraver.cc View 5 chunks +26 lines, -3 lines 0 comments Download
M scm/define-grob-properties.scm View 1 1 chunk +1 line, -0 lines 0 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 1
MikeSol
12 years, 3 months ago (2012-02-03 07:01:13 UTC) #1
Haven't had a chance to test it, but the code looks good.

Have you tested this out yet with nested tuplets?

Cheers,
MS

http://codereview.appspot.com/5623051/diff/1/lily/beaming-pattern.cc
File lily/beaming-pattern.cc (right):

http://codereview.appspot.com/5623051/diff/1/lily/beaming-pattern.cc#newcode281
lily/beaming-pattern.cc:281: infos_[i].rhythmic_importance_ = -1;
Could you include a comment indicating what the numbers mean in rhythmic
importance?
Sign in to reply to this message.

Powered by Google App Engine
RSS Feeds Recent Issues | This issue
This is Rietveld f62528b