I'm not certain if 2 days is a good number. Phil, after examining the specific ...
13 years, 2 months ago
(2012-01-25 22:10:48 UTC)
#2
I'm not certain if 2 days is a good number. Phil, after examining the specific
issues, would you say that 95% of real bug reports are handled within 2 days?
or should we make that 3 or 4 days instead?
----- Original Message ----- From: <graham@percival-music.ca> To: <janek.lilypond@gmail.com> Cc: <reply@codereview-hr.appspotmail.com>; <lilypond-devel@gnu.org> Sent: Wednesday, January 25, ...
13 years, 2 months ago
(2012-01-25 22:37:20 UTC)
#3
----- Original Message -----
From: <graham@percival-music.ca>
To: <janek.lilypond@gmail.com>
Cc: <reply@codereview-hr.appspotmail.com>; <lilypond-devel@gnu.org>
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2012 10:10 PM
Subject: Re: change bugreports expected response time (issue 5575047)
> I'm not certain if 2 days is a good number. Phil, after examining the
> specific issues, would you say that 95% of real bug reports are handled
> within 2 days? or should we make that 3 or 4 days instead?
>
> http://codereview.appspot.com/5575047/
As a Brit, I would write it slightly less definitively. "Please allow a few
days".
--
Phil Holmes
On 2012/01/25 22:37:20, mail_philholmes.net wrote: > As a Brit, I would write it slightly less ...
13 years, 2 months ago
(2012-01-26 11:27:42 UTC)
#4
On 2012/01/25 22:37:20, mail_philholmes.net wrote:
> As a Brit, I would write it slightly less definitively. "Please allow a few
> days".
I probably shouldn't have found that as funny as I did. :)
I still don't like that, though. As a user, when I report a bug, I want to know
that it's been acknowledged -- or at the very least, I want to know when I
should get a response. How about we make this 4 days to cover ourselves? We
can always decrease that number after a while if things are working out.
Issue 5575047: change bugreports expected response time
(Closed)
Created 13 years, 2 months ago by janek
Modified 13 years, 2 months ago
Reviewers: Graham Percival, mail_philholmes.net
Base URL:
Comments: 0