Undefined references in translated manuals (issue 2220).

Undefined references in translated manuals (issue 2220).

[Julien Rioux, 2012-01-13 06:13:27]

Open for review.

[lemzwerg, 2012-01-13 06:47:29]

Julien,

please apply such obvious (and trivial) fixes directly to lilypond without
creating a Rietveld issue.

[Graham Percival, 2012-01-13 07:43:47]

LGTM, I could kiss you for doing this work.

Please push directly to staging once Patchy is finished checking the compile
(about 30 minutes from now).

[pacovila, 2012-01-13 08:42:57]

Some of these changes are already pushed. I could kiss myself.

http://codereview.appspot.com/5539052/diff/1/Documentation/es/extending/schem...
File Documentation/es/extending/scheme-tutorial.itely (right):

http://codereview.appspot.com/5539052/diff/1/Documentation/es/extending/schem...
Documentation/es/extending/scheme-tutorial.itely:888: usaríamos @ref{Funciones
de Scheme vacías}, o lo almacenaríamos en un
This change is already pushed in the lilypond/translation branch, commit
30d5b6092

http://codereview.appspot.com/5539052/diff/1/Documentation/es/notation/rhythm...
File Documentation/es/notation/rhythms.itely (right):

http://codereview.appspot.com/5539052/diff/1/Documentation/es/notation/rhythm...
Documentation/es/notation/rhythms.itely:3120: ensayo, consulte @ref{Indicaciones
de texto}.  Para un control más
My commit 30d5b60 includes a change here as well to fix a wrong xref (not sure
if it was a broken xref).

http://codereview.appspot.com/5539052/diff/1/Documentation/es/notation/rhythm...
Documentation/es/notation/rhythms.itely:3122: @ref{Alineación de objetos}.
This is new, I missed it.

http://codereview.appspot.com/5539052/diff/1/Documentation/es/notation/rhythm...
Documentation/es/notation/rhythms.itely:3129: @ref{Alineación de objetos}.
Already pushed. See 30d5b609 in lilypond/translation branch.  I guess Git will
smartly merge both change sets.

[pkx166h, 2012-01-13 12:02:37]

On 13 January 2012 08:42,  <paconet.org@gmail.com> wrote:
> Some of these changes are already pushed. I could kiss myself.

can I kiss someone?

Hey perhaps we need a Kissmeister... any takers? Janek?

[janek, 2012-01-13 18:41:50]

2012/1/13 James <pkx166h@gmail.com>:
> On 13 January 2012 08:42,  <paconet.org@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Some of these changes are already pushed. I could kiss myself.
>
> can I kiss someone?
>
> Hey perhaps we need a Kissmeister... any takers? Janek?

I'm not pretty, so i guess "no" :P

Thanks for your work, Julien!  I'm inspired.

cheers,
Janek