Rietveld Code Review Tool
Help | Bug tracker | Discussion group | Source code | Sign in
(2924)

Issue 551820043: Don't use C++ operator synonym "not"

Can't Edit
Can't Publish+Mail
Start Review
Created:
4 years ago by dak
Modified:
4 years ago
Reviewers:
Dan Eble, lemzwerg
CC:
lilypond-devel_gnu.org
Visibility:
Public.

Description

Don't use C++ operator synonym "not" We don't use operator synonyms elsewhere, and they are pretty uncommon.

Patch Set 1 #

Total comments: 1
Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+1 line, -1 line) Patch
M lily/stencil-integral.cc View 1 chunk +1 line, -1 line 1 comment Download

Messages

Total messages: 2
lemzwerg
LGTM
4 years ago (2020-04-22 05:52:24 UTC) #1
Dan Eble
4 years ago (2020-04-22 20:59:26 UTC) #2
https://codereview.appspot.com/551820043/diff/563910043/lily/stencil-integral.cc
File lily/stencil-integral.cc (left):

https://codereview.appspot.com/551820043/diff/563910043/lily/stencil-integral...
lily/stencil-integral.cc:854: if (not scm_is_pair (expr))
LGTM.  I forgot that keyword existed!  :D
Sign in to reply to this message.

Powered by Google App Engine
RSS Feeds Recent Issues | This issue
This is Rietveld f62528b