Issue 5493074: Build: Dependencies for make website (issue 2027).

Keyboard Shortcuts

	File
u :	up to issue
m :	publish + mail comments
M :	edit review message
j / k :	jump to file after / before current file
J / K :	jump to next file with a comment after / before current file
	Side-by-side diff
i :	toggle intra-line diffs
e :	expand all comments
c :	collapse all comments
s :	toggle showing all comments
n / p :	next / previous diff chunk or comment
N / P :	next / previous comment
<Up> / <Down> :	next / previous line
<Enter> :	respond to / edit current comment
d :	mark current comment as done

	Issue
u :	up to list of issues
m :	publish + mail comments
j / k :	jump to patch after / before current patch
o / <Enter> :	open current patch in side-by-side view
i :	open current patch in unified diff view

	Issue List
j / k :	jump to issue after / before current issue
o / <Enter> :	open current issue
# :	close issue

	Comment/message editing
<Ctrl> + s or <Ctrl> + Enter :	save comment
<Esc> :	cancel edit

Issue 5493074: Build: Dependencies for make website (issue 2027). (Closed)

Can't Edit
Can't Publish+Mail
Start Review

Created:
12 years, 4 months ago by Julien Rioux

Modified:
12 years, 4 months ago

Reviewers:
Graham Percival

CC:
lilypond-devel_gnu.org

Visibility:
Public.

Description

Build: Dependencies for make website (issue 2027).

Patch Set 2 : Tracking bib files not necessary, added a comment #

Created: 12 years, 4 months ago

Download [raw] [tar.bz2]

		Unified diffs	Side-by-side diffs	Delta from patch set	Stats (+33 lines, -5 lines)			Patch
	M	make/website.make	View	1	4 chunks	+33 lines, -5 lines	0 comments	Download

Messages

Total messages: 4

Expand All Messages | Collapse All Messages

Graham Percival

LGTM http://codereview.appspot.com/5493074/diff/1/make/website.make File make/website.make (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/5493074/diff/1/make/website.make#newcode189 make/website.make:189: website-xrefs: website-version website-bibs $(OUT) $(xref-files) Do the xrefs ...

12 years, 4 months ago (2011-12-20 19:08:11 UTC) #2

Julien Rioux

Documentation writers: Is it correct to say as a general rule that if a file ...

12 years, 4 months ago (2011-12-20 19:25:20 UTC) #3

Julien Rioux

12 years, 4 months ago (2011-12-20 19:37:45 UTC) #4

On 2011/12/20 19:25:20, Julien Rioux wrote:
> Documentation writers: Is it correct to say as a general rule that if a file
has
> a .itexi extension, it does not contain @nodes?

OK, that's not a general rule, but it happens to be true for itexi files
generated from bib files.

Expand All Messages | Collapse All Messages