Rietveld Code Review Tool
Help | Bug tracker | Discussion group | Source code | Sign in
(5087)

Issue 547470043: Explain dead code for GUILE2 (Closed)

Can't Edit
Can't Publish+Mail
Start Review
Created:
4 years, 3 months ago by hanwenn
Modified:
4 years, 2 months ago
Reviewers:
Dan Eble, lemzwerg
CC:
lilypond-devel_gnu.org
Visibility:
Public.

Description

Explain dead code for GUILE2

Patch Set 1 #

Total comments: 2
Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+3 lines, -1 line) Patch
M lily/main.cc View 1 chunk +3 lines, -1 line 2 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 3
lemzwerg
LGTM
4 years, 3 months ago (2020-01-24 17:43:09 UTC) #1
Dan Eble
https://codereview.appspot.com/547470043/diff/547480043/lily/main.cc File lily/main.cc (right): https://codereview.appspot.com/547470043/diff/547480043/lily/main.cc#newcode447 lily/main.cc:447: /* this code is dead, but keeping this around ...
4 years, 3 months ago (2020-01-24 18:05:08 UTC) #2
hanwenn
4 years, 3 months ago (2020-01-24 18:38:45 UTC) #3
https://codereview.appspot.com/547470043/diff/547480043/lily/main.cc
File lily/main.cc (right):

https://codereview.appspot.com/547470043/diff/547480043/lily/main.cc#newcode447
lily/main.cc:447: /* this code is dead, but keeping this around until we sort
the
On 2020/01/24 18:05:08, Dan Eble wrote:
> LGTM, but ...
> 
> "'Mostly dead' is 'slightly alive.'"
> 
> It sounds like you think you might need to reinstate this.  Consider keeping
the
> #if GUILE2 and wrapping the code in if (false) {...}.  That way it will have
to
> remain compilable in the meantime, so it will be closer to ready when you need
> it.
> 
> Also, the title of this review is "Explain dead code for GUILE2," but the
change
> appears to go beyond explanation into modification.

note that the #define is GUILEV2 so this was always equivalent to #if 0
Sign in to reply to this message.

Powered by Google App Engine
RSS Feeds Recent Issues | This issue
This is Rietveld f62528b