Looks and works good for me. A nice thing about scheme patches is we can ...
13 years, 4 months ago
(2011-11-24 18:51:21 UTC)
#1
Looks and works good for me.
A nice thing about scheme patches is we can test them anywhere.
If we take out the self-doc sentence claiming "scaling" then I think everything
is good. \shiftDurations then does what it claims, with less chance of
confusion with \scaleDurations.
http://codereview.appspot.com/5437059/diff/1/scm/music-functions.scm
File scm/music-functions.scm (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/5437059/diff/1/scm/music-functions.scm#newcode237
scm/music-functions.scm:237: scales the music up by a factor `2^@var{shift} * (2
- (1/2)^@var{dot})'."
Maybe remove the second sentence of the self-doc in the same patch? I can find
nothing true in it.
http://codereview.appspot.com/5437059/diff/1/input/regression/shift-durations-negative-dots.ly File input/regression/shift-durations-negative-dots.ly (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/5437059/diff/1/input/regression/shift-durations-negative-dots.ly#newcode8 input/regression/shift-durations-negative-dots.ly:8: " '}' Or, we might do without a regression ...
13 years, 4 months ago
(2011-11-24 23:30:36 UTC)
#3
Issue 5437059: Don't let dots go negative in scaleDurations -- Fix Issue 2048
(Closed)
Created 13 years, 4 months ago by Carl
Modified 13 years, 4 months ago
Reviewers: Keith, pkx166h
Base URL:
Comments: 2