I have my problems imagining why you don't just use ly:stencil-translate on the result. If ...
12 years, 4 months ago
(2011-11-29 17:33:40 UTC)
#1
I have my problems imagining why you don't just use ly:stencil-translate on the
result.
If you really want to have a separately specifiable origin, I would not make a
separate function but rather add it as an optional argument at the end of the
argument list.
On Nov 29, 2011, at 6:33 PM, dak@gnu.org wrote: > I have my problems imagining ...
12 years, 4 months ago
(2011-11-29 18:15:19 UTC)
#2
On Nov 29, 2011, at 6:33 PM, dak@gnu.org wrote:
> I have my problems imagining why you don't just use ly:stencil-translate
> on the result.
>
> If you really want to have a separately specifiable origin, I would not
> make a separate function but rather add it as an optional argument at
> the end of the argument list.
>
Yeah, you're right...I had just dug myself deep in a coding hole w/ a piece and
was looking for an easy way out.
I did some experimenting and it looks like your solution gives an equivalent
visual result to the patch, so I'll mark as invalid.
Cheers,
MS
Issue 5434080: Adds make-connected-path-stencil-with-initial-offset
(Closed)
Created 12 years, 4 months ago by MikeSol
Modified 12 years, 4 months ago
Reviewers: dak, mike_apollinemike.com
Base URL:
Comments: 0