LGTM (modulo the comment below) http://codereview.appspot.com/4954041/diff/1/lib/Sema/AnalysisBasedWarnings.cpp File lib/Sema/AnalysisBasedWarnings.cpp (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/4954041/diff/1/lib/Sema/AnalysisBasedWarnings.cpp#newcode867 lib/Sema/AnalysisBasedWarnings.cpp:867: /// \param Exp An ...
13 years, 4 months ago
(2011-08-29 20:31:14 UTC)
#3
LGTM
(modulo the comment below)
http://codereview.appspot.com/4954041/diff/1/lib/Sema/AnalysisBasedWarnings.cpp
File lib/Sema/AnalysisBasedWarnings.cpp (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/4954041/diff/1/lib/Sema/AnalysisBasedWarnings.c...
lib/Sema/AnalysisBasedWarnings.cpp:867: /// \param Exp An expression that has
been read or written.
On 2011/08/29 18:40:51, supertri wrote:
> On 2011/08/29 17:52:41, chandlerc wrote:
> > Parameter commets shouldn't be placed in the middle of the comment block.
> >
> > This entire comment is really hard to read. It could probably be cleaned up
> some
> > to flow better and/or be formatted better.
>
> I deleted the "However" block and re-arranged the comment.
I think we do need to document the limitations of this approach as currently
implemented.
Issue 4954041: Adding support for guarded_by/var and pt_guarded_by/var annotations
Created 13 years, 4 months ago by supertri
Modified 13 years, 4 months ago
Reviewers: chandlerc
Base URL:
Comments: 11