Web:Introduction: Rename "Our Goal" box

Web:Introduction: Rename "Our Goal" box

The content of this box was somewhat confusing and inconsistent. See
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2014-01/msg00011.html

This commit tries to incorporate the suggestions made in this thread
as far as I considered appropriate.

[PhilEHolmes, 2014-01-07 10:17:47]

Please see my comment below.

https://codereview.appspot.com/48430043/diff/1/Documentation/web/introduction...
File Documentation/web/introduction.itexi (right):

https://codereview.appspot.com/48430043/diff/1/Documentation/web/introduction...
Documentation/web/introduction.itexi:14: @subheading Our Mission
I dislike this intensely.  It smacks of corporate nonsense - read the text that
large conglomerates have under "Our mission".  Please leave it as goal, or
something similar and non-corporate.

[uliska, 2014-01-07 10:45:22]

https://codereview.appspot.com/48430043/diff/1/Documentation/web/introduction...
File Documentation/web/introduction.itexi (right):

https://codereview.appspot.com/48430043/diff/1/Documentation/web/introduction...
Documentation/web/introduction.itexi:14: @subheading Our Mission
On 2014/01/07 10:17:47, PhilEHolmes wrote:
> I dislike this intensely.  It smacks of corporate nonsense - read the text
that
> large conglomerates have under "Our mission".  Please leave it as goal, or
> something similar and non-corporate.

Too bad you didn't notice that in one of my earlier
suggestions...

I don't like the "Goal" because it sounds too much like
something unachieved.

Any other suggestions?

[mail_philholmes.net, 2014-01-07 10:55:35]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <lilyliska@googlemail.com>
To: <phileholmes@googlemail.com>
Cc: <reply@codereview-hr.appspotmail.com>; <lilypond-devel@gnu.org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2014 10:45 AM
Subject: Re: Web:Introduction: Rename "Our Goal" box (issue 48430043)


>
>
https://codereview.appspot.com/48430043/diff/1/Documentation/web/introduction...
> File Documentation/web/introduction.itexi (right):
>
>
https://codereview.appspot.com/48430043/diff/1/Documentation/web/introduction...
> Documentation/web/introduction.itexi:14: @subheading Our Mission
> On 2014/01/07 10:17:47, PhilEHolmes wrote:
>> I dislike this intensely.  It smacks of corporate nonsense - read the
> text that
>> large conglomerates have under "Our mission".  Please leave it as
> goal, or
>> something similar and non-corporate.
>
> Too bad you didn't notice that in one of my earlier
> suggestions...

I did, but was not sure what you were proposing to change, as opposed to 
just making suggestions.

> I don't like the "Goal" because it sounds too much like
> something unachieved.
>
> Any other suggestions?

"Our goal" :-)  No less achieved than a mission.

> https://codereview.appspot.com/48430043/
>
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-devel mailing list
> lilypond-devel@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
>

--
Phil Holmes 

[dak, 2014-01-07 11:25:15]

On 2014/01/07 10:45:22, uliska wrote:
>
https://codereview.appspot.com/48430043/diff/1/Documentation/web/introduction...
> File Documentation/web/introduction.itexi (right):
> 
>
https://codereview.appspot.com/48430043/diff/1/Documentation/web/introduction...
> Documentation/web/introduction.itexi:14: @subheading Our Mission
> On 2014/01/07 10:17:47, PhilEHolmes wrote:
> > I dislike this intensely.  It smacks of corporate nonsense - read the text
> that
> > large conglomerates have under "Our mission".  Please leave it as goal, or
> > something similar and non-corporate.
> 
> Too bad you didn't notice that in one of my earlier
> suggestions...
> 
> I don't like the "Goal" because it sounds too much like
> something unachieved.
> 
> Any other suggestions?

Well, "objective".  Now I don't want to committee-water-down everything
proposed, but it's rather exclusionary to state this as "the" objective:
basically it describes the main motivation for improving specific aspects of the
backend, basically centered around solving issues marked as "Ugly".

Basically, it focuses on those metrics where we hope to make LilyPond "better"
than Finale or Sibelius or Capella or whatever.  But it does not address those
parts of LilyPond where it is _different_ from the contenders.  For me, the main
difference is that I can make LilyPond do what I want, in a manner best suiting
_my_ vision of how to create music.  The backend, like a good orchestra, makes
sure that I can focus on my own vision rather than having to teach the tool the
basics of good music.  That's good since it frees my mind for that which is
important, namely talking to LilyPond about music rather than typesetting.

[uliska, 2014-01-07 12:17:42]

Suggestion after discussion

[c_sorensen, 2014-01-07 13:32:23]

On Jan 7, 2014, at 3:56 AM, "Phil Holmes" <mail@philholmes.net> wrote:

> ----- Original Message ----- From: <lilyliska@googlemail.com>
> To: <phileholmes@googlemail.com>
> Cc: <reply@codereview-hr.appspotmail.com>; <lilypond-devel@gnu.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2014 10:45 AM
> Subject: Re: Web:Introduction: Rename "Our Goal" box (issue 48430043)
> 
>> 
>> Any other suggestions?
> 
> "Our goal" :-)  No less achieved than a mission.
> 

Intent
Object
Ambition
Desire
Hope
Plan
Aim


Carl

[uliska, 2014-01-07 19:21:23]

reverting the box title (finally)

[Graham Percival, 2014-01-09 09:32:01]

LGTM