I feel like the binaries shouldn't be intermixed with the source tree, e.g. it should ...
12 years, 8 months ago
(2011-08-02 17:14:43 UTC)
#2
I feel like the binaries shouldn't be intermixed with the source tree, e.g. it
should be in a directory directly under /trunk/.
I don't have a strong opinion.
I think there'd be a strong argument for doing this if we had a per-project ...
12 years, 8 months ago
(2011-08-02 17:32:37 UTC)
#4
I think there'd be a strong argument for doing this if we had a per-project
DEPS file, as then we could avoid syncing the binary release dir when
working on sources.
As-is, everyone syncs /trunk/, so there's not much benefit. I'd like to move
Syzygy to a different repo eventually, at which point we should revisit
this.
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 1:14 PM, <maruel@chromium.org> wrote:
> I feel like the binaries shouldn't be intermixed with the source tree,
> e.g. it should be in a directory directly under /trunk/.
>
> I don't have a strong opinion.
>
>
>
http://codereview.appspot.com/**4842043/<http://codereview.appspot.com/4842043/>
>
Issue 4842043: Move syzygy binary release to public repo.
(Closed)
Created 12 years, 8 months ago by Roger McFarlane
Modified 12 years, 8 months ago
Reviewers: chrisha, M-A, Siggi, jeffbailey
Base URL: http://sawbuck.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/
Comments: 0