>Hah, it also works fine if you use left/right-bound-info (as I >originally suggested. ;) > ...
13 years, 10 months ago
(2011-07-03 21:21:51 UTC)
#1
>Hah, it also works fine if you use left/right-bound-info (as I
>originally suggested. ;)
>
>Cheers,
>Neil
Hey Neil,
I tried to implement your suggestion via the logic in this patch, but it doesn't
seem to work (it gets the same result as the current master). Any pointers?
On 2011/07/03 21:21:51, MikeSol wrote: > >Hah, it also works fine if you use left/right-bound-info ...
13 years, 10 months ago
(2011-07-03 21:33:06 UTC)
#2
On 2011/07/03 21:21:51, MikeSol wrote:
> >Hah, it also works fine if you use left/right-bound-info (as I
> >originally suggested. ;)
> >
> >Cheers,
> >Neil
>
> Hey Neil,
>
> I tried to implement your suggestion via the logic in this patch, but it
doesn't
> seem to work (it gets the same result as the current master). Any pointers?
Two things stick out:
1) You need to prevent calc_bound_info () from generating 'Y if simple-Y is set;
2) Don't set bound-details. You should return the revised bound-info,
i.e., read the left/right default bound-info, calculate new-Y as before then
acons new-Y to old bound-info.
Issue 4654085: First stab at using the left and right bound detail callbacks.
(Closed)
Created 13 years, 10 months ago by MikeSol
Modified 13 years, 10 months ago
Reviewers: Neil Puttock
Base URL:
Comments: 0