Rietveld Code Review Tool
Help | Bug tracker | Discussion group | Source code | Sign in
(1039)

Issue 4570042: Fix for putImageData

Can't Edit
Can't Publish+Mail
Start Review
Created:
13 years, 5 months ago by gmanchromium
Modified:
13 years, 5 months ago
Reviewers:
junov, bsalomon, reed1
CC:
skia-review_googlegroups.com
Base URL:
http://skia.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/gpu/
Visibility:
Public.

Description

Fix for putImageData TEST=manually ran tests that were failing BUG=84165 TBR=reed@google.com

Patch Set 1 #

Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+1 line, -0 lines) Patch
M src/GrContext.cpp View 1 chunk +1 line, -0 lines 0 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 6
kbr1
Committed as http://code.google.com/p/skia/source/detail?r=1518 .
13 years, 5 months ago (2011-06-07 01:27:38 UTC) #1
gmanchromium
Hey Mike, Justin and I found this issue. Can you take a look and make ...
13 years, 5 months ago (2011-06-07 02:22:00 UTC) #2
reed1
Seems right. I'll make sure brian sees it too.
13 years, 5 months ago (2011-06-07 11:41:01 UTC) #3
bsalomon
On 2011/06/07 11:41:01, reed1 wrote: > Seems right. I'll make sure brian sees it too. ...
13 years, 5 months ago (2011-06-07 12:39:18 UTC) #4
bsalomon
On 2011/06/07 12:39:18, bsalomon wrote: > On 2011/06/07 11:41:01, reed1 wrote: > > Seems right. ...
13 years, 5 months ago (2011-06-07 12:43:08 UTC) #5
junov
13 years, 5 months ago (2011-06-07 14:41:31 UTC) #6
I agree.  I just didn't feel comfortable doing that for the branch. Also, I
want to make changes to dumpRenderTree to force it to re-init (possibly
destroy and re-create) GrContext/GrDrawTarget between tests.  The reason
that layout tests were not failing was because previous tests were
performing some state intitialization that was persisting into the following
tests.  Gregg picked-up on this when he realized that a test failed in
isolation despite passing when executed in a larger batch.

On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 8:43 AM, <bsalomon@google.com> wrote:

> On 2011/06/07 12:39:18, bsalomon wrote:
>
>> On 2011/06/07 11:41:01, reed1 wrote:
>> > Seems right. I'll make sure brian sees it too.
>>
>
>  LGTM
>>
>
> LGTM, too.
>
> When the modified code was originally written there was no color filter.
> We really should have a "reset to default" type call so that we don't
> have to remember to modify this code (and possibly others) every time we
> add state. I'll file a skia issue against myself for this.
>
>
>
http://codereview.appspot.com/**4570042/<http://codereview.appspot.com/4570042/>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "skia-review" group.
> To post to this group, send email to skia-review@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to skia-review+unsubscribe@**
> googlegroups.com <skia-review%2Bunsubscribe@googlegroups.com>.
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/**
> group/skia-review?hl=en <http://groups.google.com/group/skia-review?hl=en>
> .
>
>
Sign in to reply to this message.

Powered by Google App Engine
RSS Feeds Recent Issues | This issue
This is Rietveld f62528b