tiny test change

tiny comment-only change just to exercise code checkin

[bsalomon, 2011-04-20 15:24:14]

Fine, but how will we prevent this from breaking again in the future? How do we
know that all //// comments throughout the code base have the same length? I
think this change requires a new unit test that parses all the code on each
checkin to verify comment consistency.

LGTM.

On 2011/04/20 15:04:27, epoger wrote:

[epoger, 2011-04-20 15:34:26]

On 2011/04/20 15:24:14, bsalomon wrote:
> Fine, but how will we prevent this from breaking again in the future? How do
we
> know that all //// comments throughout the code base have the same length? I
> think this change requires a new unit test that parses all the code on each
> checkin to verify comment consistency.
> 
> LGTM.
> 
> On 2011/04/20 15:04:27, epoger wrote:

A very good point.  Ignoring.

[epoger, 2011-04-20 16:17:14]

committed as r1163