Rietveld Code Review Tool
Help | Bug tracker | Discussion group | Source code | Sign in
(1502)

Issue 4099044: Fix issue 1376 ambitus two accidentals. (Closed)

Can't Edit
Can't Publish+Mail
Start Review
Created:
13 years, 3 months ago by Graham Percival (old account)
Modified:
13 years, 3 months ago
Reviewers:
carl.d.sorensen, Neil Puttock
CC:
lilypond-devel_gnu.org
Visibility:
Public.

Description

Fix issue 1376 ambitus two accidentals. Add regtest for 1376 ambitus accidentals. When an ambitus consists of a single note with different alterations, two accidentals should be printed, no matter the key signature.

Patch Set 1 #

Total comments: 4

Patch Set 2 : Fix nitpicks #

Patch Set 3 : fix another nitpick #

Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+12 lines, -2 lines) Patch
M input/regression/ambitus.ly View 1 2 2 chunks +7 lines, -1 line 0 comments Download
M lily/ambitus-engraver.cc View 1 1 chunk +5 lines, -1 line 0 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 5
Neil Puttock
LGTM. http://codereview.appspot.com/4099044/diff/1/input/regression/ambitus.ly File input/regression/ambitus.ly (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/4099044/diff/1/input/regression/ambitus.ly#newcode8 input/regression/ambitus.ly:8: Two noteheads are displayed even for a note ...
13 years, 3 months ago (2011-01-23 18:00:23 UTC) #1
Graham Percival (old account)
On 2011/01/23 18:00:23, Neil Puttock wrote: > LGTM. Thanks! I've uploaded patchset 3, which I ...
13 years, 3 months ago (2011-01-23 18:21:11 UTC) #2
Neil Puttock
On 2011/01/23 18:21:11, Graham Percival wrote: > I've uploaded patchset 3, which I believe fixes ...
13 years, 3 months ago (2011-01-23 22:35:02 UTC) #3
Carl
LGTM. Carl
13 years, 3 months ago (2011-01-24 02:38:47 UTC) #4
Graham Percival (old account)
13 years, 3 months ago (2011-01-24 16:35:41 UTC) #5
On 2011/01/23 22:35:02, Neil Puttock wrote:
> Sorry Graham, my comment on the regtest should've been clearer: I wasn't
> proposing we add that information to the test (since it only applies to the
new
> case fixed by this patch); it's just that the original text is ambiguous (the
> part about two noteheads, since we can only see one in the altered unison
case).

Ok, no problem.  I pushed the modified regtest text, since it certainly doesn't
hurt.

Cheers,
- Graham
Sign in to reply to this message.

Powered by Google App Engine
RSS Feeds Recent Issues | This issue
This is Rietveld f62528b