http://codereview.appspot.com/3264041/diff/1/docs/CodingStandards.html File docs/CodingStandards.html (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/3264041/diff/1/docs/CodingStandards.html#newcode801 docs/CodingStandards.html:801: camel case (e.g. <tt>TextFileReader</tt> and <tt>isLValue</tt>). I would really ...
http://codereview.appspot.com/3264041/diff/1/docs/CodingStandards.html
File docs/CodingStandards.html (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/3264041/diff/1/docs/CodingStandards.html#newcod...
docs/CodingStandards.html:801: camel case (e.g. <tt>TextFileReader</tt> and
<tt>isLValue</tt>).
I would really prefer some stylistic difference between variables and
types/functions. This is mostly a problem (for me) with local variables, where
having some signifier of the locality helps me in reading it.
The most common style I have worked with is to use under_score_separators for
variables. Personally, I would advocate for sharing this style with member
variables as well, but those aren't as important to me when reading code.
Issue 3264041: add rule for naming type/function/variable to the coding standards
Created 14 years ago by wan
Modified 14 years ago
Reviewers: chandlerc
Base URL: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/
Comments: 1