Web: nest GSOC project ideas under subsection/h3

Web: nest GSOC project ideas under subsection/h3

[pwm, 2017-02-18 17:19:11]

I'll upload screenshots to the issue tracker.

[git, 2017-02-18 17:49:05]

LGTM (based on the screenshots)

[Graham Percival, 2017-02-22 19:01:52]

https://codereview.appspot.com/314530043/diff/1/Documentation/css/lilypond-we...
File Documentation/css/lilypond-website.css (right):

https://codereview.appspot.com/314530043/diff/1/Documentation/css/lilypond-we...
Documentation/css/lilypond-website.css:709: font-size: 1.17em;
what else does this change on the webpage?  I mean, don't we use @subheading
anywhere else?

[Graham Percival, 2017-02-22 19:04:46]

Sorry, I disagree.  I think the boxes make it easier to skim the page; there
horizontal gap makes it absolutely clear that each proposal is distinct.

I have no opinion about using bold vs. italics for the "difficulty",
"requirements", etc. parts, though.

[Graham Percival, 2017-02-22 19:07:15]

On 2017/02/22 19:01:52, Graham Percival wrote:
> what else does this change on the webpage?  I mean, don't we use @subheading
> anywhere else?

On that note, I wrote a tool for my job that does regression testing for a
website (very similar to our lilypond regression tests).  I'll try to polish it
and get my boss to OK open-sourcing it in the next few days.

This will help future CSS development by giving us confidence that there's no
unintended changes.

Cheers,
- Graham

[paul_paulwmorris.com, 2017-02-23 03:36:20]

On 02/22/2017 02:07 PM, graham@percival-music.ca wrote:

> On that note, I wrote a tool for my job that does regression testing for
> a website (very similar to our lilypond regression tests).  I'll try to
> polish it and get my boss to OK open-sourcing it in the next few days.
>
> This will help future CSS development by giving us confidence that
> there's no unintended changes.

Nice!  That sounds great.

-Paul

[pkx166h, 2017-03-04 18:04:30]

Hey Graham, any approval for your tool?

James

[Graham Percival, 2017-03-06 07:14:04]

Sorry for the delay.  My tool isn't public yet (hopefully tomorrow or Tuesday),
but I just ran it on the lilypond website and it looks fine.

This change LGTM.

[pwm, 2017-03-15 02:44:17]

Only change appearance of GSOC project ideas

[pwm, 2017-03-15 02:49:10]

On 2017/03/15 02:44:17, pwm wrote:
> Only change appearance of GSOC project ideas

I've rebased this now that issue 5085 landed (which changed some text on the
GSOC page).  Also, I looked at the other pages that were affected by the CSS
changes in patch set 1, and did not like the results.  So patch set 2 only
changes the appearance of the GSOC project ideas, leaving the rest of the site
unchanged.

-Paul