Issue 3003: [issue3560] redundant "base" field in memoryview objects

Keyboard Shortcuts

	File
u :	up to issue
m :	publish + mail comments
M :	edit review message
j / k :	jump to file after / before current file
J / K :	jump to next file with a comment after / before current file
	Side-by-side diff
i :	toggle intra-line diffs
e :	expand all comments
c :	collapse all comments
s :	toggle showing all comments
n / p :	next / previous diff chunk or comment
N / P :	next / previous comment
<Up> / <Down> :	next / previous line
<Enter> :	respond to / edit current comment
d :	mark current comment as done

	Issue
u :	up to list of issues
m :	publish + mail comments
j / k :	jump to patch after / before current patch
o / <Enter> :	open current patch in side-by-side view
i :	open current patch in unified diff view

	Issue List
j / k :	jump to issue after / before current issue
o / <Enter> :	open current issue
# :	close issue

	Comment/message editing
<Ctrl> + s or <Ctrl> + Enter :	save comment
<Esc> :	cancel edit

Issue 3003: [issue3560] redundant "base" field in memoryview objects (Closed)

Can't Edit
Can't Publish+Mail
Start Review

Created:
16 years, 4 months ago by GvR

Modified:
15 years, 5 months ago

Reviewers:

CC:
Antoine Pitrou, report_bugs.python.org

Base URL:
http://svn.python.org/view/*checkout*/python/branches/py3k/

Visibility:
Public.

http://bugs.python.org/issue3560

Created: 16 years, 4 months ago

Download [raw] [tar.bz2]

Unified diffs	Side-by-side diffs	Stats (+24 lines, -18 lines)			Patch
Include/memoryobject.h	View	3 chunks	+19 lines, -13 lines	0 comments	Download
Modules/_json.c	View	1 chunk	+1 line, -1 line	0 comments	Download
Objects/memoryobject.c	View	3 chunks	+3 lines, -3 lines	0 comments	Download
Objects/unicodeobject.c	View	1 chunk	+1 line, -1 line	0 comments	Download

Total messages: 3

GvR

Looks good. Go ahead and submit, assuming you've run full tests.

16 years, 4 months ago (2008-08-19 17:18:29 UTC) #1

GvR

16 years, 4 months ago (2008-08-19 17:20:58 UTC) #3

On 2008/08/19 17:18:45, GvR wrote:
> PS. The PEP probably needs an update. And the docs.

And Misc/NEWS