Accouting test using doctest

[yangoon1, 2010-10-14 12:05:35]

Nice

http://codereview.appspot.com/2507041/diff/1/accounting.rst
File accounting.rst (right):

http://codereview.appspot.com/2507041/diff/1/accounting.rst#newcode15
accounting.rst:15: ...     ('name', 'in', ['company', 'account',
'account_invoice']),
If you only install account_invoice, you have a check for correct dependency
handling

[udono, 2010-10-14 12:14:38]

http://codereview.appspot.com/2507041/diff/1/accounting.rst
File accounting.rst (right):

http://codereview.appspot.com/2507041/diff/1/accounting.rst#newcode15
accounting.rst:15: ...     ('name', 'in', ['company', 'account',
'account_invoice']),
On 2010/10/14 12:05:36, yangoon wrote:
> If you only install account_invoice, you have a check for correct dependency
> handling
Yes, in 'my' tests it works with correct handling.
Testing for correct dependency handling shoud be dne in module test for module
ir

[ced, 2010-10-14 12:31:13]

http://codereview.appspot.com/2507041/diff/1/accounting.rst
File accounting.rst (right):

http://codereview.appspot.com/2507041/diff/1/accounting.rst#newcode15
accounting.rst:15: ...     ('name', 'in', ['company', 'account',
'account_invoice']),
On 2010/10/14 12:05:36, yangoon wrote:
> If you only install account_invoice, you have a check for correct dependency
> handling

I just install the modules from which come the Model that I use.
So I did not care about dependency here.