I don’t know much about email, but the code itself looks good to me. I ...
14 years, 5 months ago
(2010-08-21 15:24:14 UTC)
#1
I don’t know much about email, but the code itself looks good to me. I see there
is only one new test; I hope this means that the old behavior is already covered
and that the new code does not break compatibility. If this is the case, nice
bug fix.
http://codereview.appspot.com/217107/diff/1/2
File Lib/email/_parseaddr.py (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/217107/diff/1/2#newcode1
Lib/email/_parseaddr.py:1: # Copyright (C) 2002-2007, 2010 Python Software
Foundation
“2002-2010” would make more sense.
http://codereview.appspot.com/217107/diff/1/2#newcode24
Lib/email/_parseaddr.py:24: DOY_UNKNOWN = 1
Can you add a comment explaining what DOY means, unless it’s obvious for email
specialists?
Issue 217107: Python parsedate two-digit year behavior (Py3k)
Created 14 years, 10 months ago by jfinkels
Modified 14 years, 5 months ago
Reviewers: merwok
Base URL:
Comments: 2