On 2010/08/04 21:57:20, Neil Puttock wrote: > Hi Joe, > > LGTM. > > I'd ...
13 years, 8 months ago
(2010-08-06 21:57:28 UTC)
#2
On 2010/08/04 21:57:20, Neil Puttock wrote:
> Hi Joe,
>
> LGTM.
>
> I'd be quite happy with this method, even though it loses a bit of flexibility
> in comparison with your original patch.
Thanks, fixed and pushed. I don't particularly see much use for the original
flexibility, but we can always add it on later. It would just be a new interface
anyway to the same backend code anyway.
Cheers,
Joe
Issue 1888042: Fix 442.
(Closed)
Created 13 years, 9 months ago by joeneeman
Modified 13 years, 8 months ago
Reviewers: Neil Puttock
Base URL:
Comments: 2