On 2010/06/10 09:39:53, milan.tribuson wrote:
> It is simpler but I don't know if I would divide the function into two. I've
> tried your code and it works fine.
The method "Mod 11,10" is generic and we will perhaps find in other VAT check
On 2010/06/10 09:42:21, ced wrote:
> On 2010/06/10 09:39:53, milan.tribuson wrote:
> > It is simpler but I don't know if I would divide the function into two. I've
> > tried your code and it works fine.
>
> The method "Mod 11,10" is generic and we will perhaps find in other VAT check
Ok, than it's ok to leave it this way.
