Rietveld Code Review Tool
Help | Bug tracker | Discussion group | Source code | Sign in
(1150)

Issue 14633043: Document how completion engravers split scaled notes; issue 3560

Can't Edit
Can't Publish+Mail
Start Review
Created:
10 years, 6 months ago by Keith
Modified:
10 years, 6 months ago
Reviewers:
dak
CC:
lilypond-devel_gnu.org
Visibility:
Public.

Description

Document how completion engravers split scaled notes; issue 3560 Also make the behavior changeable.

Patch Set 1 #

Patch Set 2 : extend regression tests #

Patch Set 3 : patchset without regtest changes #

Total comments: 2
Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+65 lines, -25 lines) Patch
M Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely View 2 chunks +38 lines, -7 lines 1 comment Download
M lily/completion-note-heads-engraver.cc View 3 chunks +11 lines, -9 lines 1 comment Download
M lily/completion-rest-engraver.cc View 3 chunks +11 lines, -9 lines 0 comments Download
M scm/define-context-properties.scm View 1 chunk +5 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 2
Keith
https://codereview.appspot.com/14633043/diff/2/Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely File Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely (right): https://codereview.appspot.com/14633043/diff/2/Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely#newcode1889 Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely:1889: the treatment of shorter scaled durations, but is surpising ...
10 years, 6 months ago (2013-10-13 04:21:03 UTC) #1
dak
10 years, 6 months ago (2013-10-25 08:25:48 UTC) #2
https://codereview.appspot.com/14633043/diff/2/lily/completion-note-heads-eng...
File lily/completion-note-heads-engraver.cc (right):

https://codereview.appspot.com/14633043/diff/2/lily/completion-note-heads-eng...
lily/completion-note-heads-engraver.cc:202: if (left_to_do_ > longest_scaled ->
main_part_ )
Actually, moving the factor decision here is the smart thing to do.
Sign in to reply to this message.

Powered by Google App Engine
RSS Feeds Recent Issues | This issue
This is Rietveld f62528b