Looks good for me so far, but I would indeed prefer a separate group "Stock ...
15 years, 5 months ago
(2009-10-13 11:06:42 UTC)
#1
Looks good for me so far, but I would indeed prefer a separate group "Stock
Force Assignment", because I wouldn't want to give permission for the
administration of the whole stock to a user, that shall just be allowed to
force_assign.
On 2009/10/13 11:06:42, yangoon wrote: > Looks good for me so far, but I would ...
15 years, 5 months ago
(2009-10-13 11:24:33 UTC)
#2
On 2009/10/13 11:06:42, yangoon wrote:
> Looks good for me so far, but I would indeed prefer a separate group "Stock
> Force Assignment"
Yes, for me it would be better, too, to have another group
On 2009/10/13 11:24:33, udo.spallek wrote: > On 2009/10/13 11:06:42, yangoon wrote: > > Looks good ...
15 years, 5 months ago
(2009-10-14 09:09:35 UTC)
#3
On 2009/10/13 11:24:33, udo.spallek wrote:
> On 2009/10/13 11:06:42, yangoon wrote:
> > Looks good for me so far, but I would indeed prefer a separate group "Stock
> > Force Assignment"
> Yes, for me it would be better, too, to have another group
Agree too
Issue 130070: Move group for force assignment to group_stock_admin for issue961[Fix with changeset 385aaae700a0]
(Closed)
Created 15 years, 5 months ago by udono
Modified 11 years, 8 months ago
Reviewers: yangoon1, ced1
Base URL:
Comments: 0