Rietveld Code Review Tool
Help | Bug tracker | Discussion group | Source code | Sign in
(4428)

Issue 10253046: Cleanup README a bit. (Closed)

Can't Edit
Can't Publish+Mail
Start Review
Created:
10 years, 10 months ago by Andi
Modified:
10 years, 10 months ago
Reviewers:
techtonik, dhermes
Visibility:
Public.

Description

Cleanup README a bit.

Patch Set 1 #

Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+4 lines, -3 lines) Patch
M README View 1 chunk +4 lines, -3 lines 0 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 6
Andi
10 years, 10 months ago (2013-06-13 11:02:55 UTC) #1
techtonik
LGTM FWIW. =)
10 years, 10 months ago (2013-06-13 11:56:40 UTC) #2
Andi
The original idea was to enable "auto_id_policy: legacy" to avoid scattered IDs. Do you remember, ...
10 years, 10 months ago (2013-06-13 12:24:14 UTC) #3
techtonik
In that case I am for detecting version of SDK and reporting if we need ...
10 years, 10 months ago (2013-06-15 16:18:07 UTC) #4
Andi
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 6:18 PM, <techtonik@gmail.com> wrote: > In that case I ...
10 years, 10 months ago (2013-06-17 03:40:53 UTC) #5
techtonik
10 years, 10 months ago (2013-06-17 05:56:15 UTC) #6
Message was sent while issue was closed.
On 2013/06/17 03:40:53, Andi wrote:
> I don't think that it's needed to maintain something like a
> requirements file. ATM the only requirement that Rietveld has is
> Django 1.3 and that's distributed along the SDK and listed (with
> version) in the libraries section in app.yaml.

Right. SDK has it all. As for the auto id policy, I am not ready to
switch to it yet. =)
Sign in to reply to this message.

Powered by Google App Engine
RSS Feeds Recent Issues | This issue
This is Rietveld f62528b